Dr Anna Krystallli
R-RSE
“an article about computational result is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code and data, that produced the result.”
John Claerbout paraphrased in Buckheit and Donoho (1995)
Many issues statistical and a results of broken Academic incentive systems.
Much can be tackled by transparency and better computational literacy.
ROGER D. PENG, SCIENCE 02 DEC 2011 : 1226-1227
Reproducibility has the potential to serve as a minimum standard for judging scientific claims when full independent replication of a study is not possible.
Nielsen, Michael. Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton University Press, 2012. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7s4vx.
Sharing resources
Collective intelligence
Mass collaboration
So how far have we come?
We need better digital curation of the workhorses of modern science: code & data
aim to create secure materials that are FAIR findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable
Think about traceability and provenance.
Follow community conventions.
Prepare it to share it.
Funders: value for money, impact, reputation
Publishers: many now require code and data.
PIs, Supervisors and immediate research group
Your wider scientific community
The public
Be your own best friend:
“Agree on a community convention…then follow it””
“ …We introduce the concept of a compendium as both a container for the different elements that make up the document and its computations (i.e. text, code, data, …), and as a means for distributing, managing and updating the collection.”
Ultimately, to change how science works for better for everyone!
We’ll do this by introducing you to useful data and software tools and best practices.
We’ll take regular breaks and aim to break for lunch between 13:00 - 14:00 for an hour